Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/ǵn̥h₃sḱéti

This Proto-Indo-European entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Indo-European

Etymology

    From *ǵneh₃- (to recognise, to know) +‎ *-sḱéti (durative verbal suffix).

    Verb

    *ǵn̥h₃sḱéti (imperfective)[1][2][3]

    1. to recognise

    Reconstruction notes

    • The zero-grade form *ǵn̥h₃sḱéti ought to produce Latin *nāscō rather than Latin nōscō, which would be expected from the full-grade.[3] Thus, Sihler reconstructs Proto-Indo-European *ǵneh₃sḱéti, despite the general tendency for sḱé-presents to showcase the zero-grade of the root.[4] However, De Vaan alternatively suggests that the full-grade was introduced into the Latin term from the aorist or perhaps the perfect, possibly because the expected *nāscō was identical with nāscō (to be born).[3] In support of his reconstruction, Sihler notes that Ancient Greek γιγνώσκω (gignṓskō) may also showcase the full grade,[4] although Beekes reconstructs a zero-grade form as the ancestor of the Greek term.[5] Beekes does suggest full-grade vocalism in Albanian njoh, which Oryol traces back to influence from the aorist njova.[6]
    • The EIEC suggests that all of these formations may be independent innovations.[7]

    Conjugation

    Imperfective, thematic
    3rd singular *ǵn̥h₃sḱéti
    3rd plural *ǵn̥h₃sḱónti
    Active voice Present indicative Past indicative Imperative Subjunctive Optative
    1st singular *ǵn̥h₃sḱóh₂ *ǵn̥h₃sḱóm *ǵn̥h₃sḱṓh₂ *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyh₁m̥
    2nd singular *ǵn̥h₃sḱési *ǵn̥h₃sḱés *ǵn̥h₃sḱé *ǵn̥h₃sḱḗsi *ǵn̥h₃sḱóys
    3rd singular *ǵn̥h₃sḱéti *ǵn̥h₃sḱét *ǵn̥h₃sḱétu *ǵn̥h₃sḱḗti *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyt
    1st dual *ǵn̥h₃sḱówos *ǵn̥h₃sḱówe *ǵn̥h₃sḱṓwos *ǵn̥h₃sḱóywe
    2nd dual *ǵn̥h₃sḱétes *ǵn̥h₃sḱétom *ǵn̥h₃sḱétom *ǵn̥h₃sḱḗtes *ǵn̥h₃sḱóytom
    3rd dual *ǵn̥h₃sḱétes *ǵn̥h₃sḱétām *ǵn̥h₃sḱétām *ǵn̥h₃sḱḗtes *ǵn̥h₃sḱóytām
    1st plural *ǵn̥h₃sḱómos *ǵn̥h₃sḱóme *ǵn̥h₃sḱṓmos *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyme
    2nd plural *ǵn̥h₃sḱéte *ǵn̥h₃sḱéte *ǵn̥h₃sḱéte *ǵn̥h₃sḱḗte *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyte
    3rd plural *ǵn̥h₃sḱónti *ǵn̥h₃sḱónt *ǵn̥h₃sḱóntu *ǵn̥h₃sḱṓnti *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyh₁n̥t
    Participle *ǵn̥h₃sḱónts
    Middle voice Present indicative Past indicative Imperative Subjunctive Optative
    1st singular *ǵn̥h₃sḱóh₂er *ǵn̥h₃sḱóh₂e *ǵn̥h₃sḱṓh₂er *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyh₂e
    2nd singular *ǵn̥h₃sḱéth₂er *ǵn̥h₃sḱéth₂e *ǵn̥h₃sḱéso *ǵn̥h₃sḱḗth₂er *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyth₂e
    3rd singular *ǵn̥h₃sḱétor *ǵn̥h₃sḱéto *? *ǵn̥h₃sḱḗtor *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyto, *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyh₁o
    1st dual *ǵn̥h₃sḱówosdʰh₂ *ǵn̥h₃sḱówedʰh₂ *ǵn̥h₃sḱṓwosdʰh₂ *ǵn̥h₃sḱóywedʰh₂
    2nd dual *? *? *? *? *?
    3rd dual *? *? *? *? *?
    1st plural *ǵn̥h₃sḱómosdʰh₂ *ǵn̥h₃sḱómedʰh₂ *ǵn̥h₃sḱṓmosdʰh₂ *ǵn̥h₃sḱóymedʰh₂
    2nd plural *ǵn̥h₃sḱédʰh₂we *ǵn̥h₃sḱédʰh₂we *ǵn̥h₃sḱédʰh₂we *ǵn̥h₃sḱḗdʰh₂we *ǵn̥h₃sḱóydʰh₂we
    3rd plural *ǵn̥h₃sḱóntor *ǵn̥h₃sḱónto *? *ǵn̥h₃sḱṓntor *ǵn̥h₃sḱóyro
    Participle *ǵn̥h₃sḱómnos

    Alternative reconstructions

    • *ǵneh₃sḱéti[4]

    Descendants

    • Proto-Albanian: *gnāska
    • Proto-Armenian:
    • >? Proto-Balto-Slavic: *źinˀtei (present stem *źinˀsté-)[8] (or secondarily created in East Baltic[9])
      • East Baltic:
        • Latvian: pazīt (1sg. pazīstu)
        • Lithuanian: pažinti (1sg. pažį̇́stu)
    • Proto-Hellenic: *gignṓskō (with secondary reduplication)
    • Proto-Indo-Iranian: *ȷ́naHsćáti (with secondary full-grade)
      • Proto-Iranian: *jnaHscáti
        • Parthian: 𐫙𐫢𐫗𐫀𐫘 (ʿšnʾs /⁠išnās-⁠/, to recognize, get to know)
        • Old Persian: 𐎧𐏁𐎴𐎠𐎿𐎠𐎫𐎹 (x-š-n-a-s-a-t-y /⁠xšnāsātiy⁠/, 3sg.subj.)[1]
          • Middle Persian:
            Manichaean script: 𐫙𐫢𐫗𐫀𐫘 (ʿšnʾs /⁠išnās-⁠/)
            Book Pahlavi script: [Book Pahlavi needed] (šnʾs /⁠šnās-⁠/)
    • Proto-Italic: *gnōskō (see there for further descendants)

    References

    1. 1.0 1.1 Ringe, Donald (2006), From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (A Linguistic History of English; 1)‎[1], Oxford: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 34:*ǵn̥h₃-sḱé/ó-
    2. ^ Rix, Helmut, editor (2001), Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben [Lexicon of Indo-European Verbs] (in German), 2nd edition, Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, →ISBN, page 169
    3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 De Vaan, Michiel (2008), “nōscō, -ere”, in Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 7), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, pages 413-414
    4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Sihler, Andrew L. (1995), New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 507
    5. ^ Beekes, Robert S. P. (2010), “γιγνώσκω”, in Etymological Dictionary of Greek (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 10), with the assistance of Lucien van Beek, Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 273
    6. ^ Oryol, Vladimir E. (1998), “njoh”, in Albanian Etymological Dictionary, Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, →ISBN, page 305
    7. ^ Mallory, J. P., Adams, D. Q., editors (1997), “*ĝneh₃-”, in Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, London, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, pages 336-337
    8. ^ Lipp, Reiner (2009), Die indogermanischen und einzelsprachlichen Palatale im Indoiranischen: Neurekonstruktion, Nuristan-Sprachen, Genese der indoarischen Retroflexe, Indoarisch von Mitanni (Indogermanische Bibliothek; 3) (in German), volume 1, Heidelberg: Winter, page 17:idg. *ĝn̥h₃-ské- > baltoslaw. *ǰin- sčé- > *ǰin-sté- > urbalt. ǰín-sta- > lit. pa-žį́stu
    9. ^ Villanueva Svensson, Miguel (2008), “Lithuanian žinóti „to know “.”, in Baltistica, volume 43.2, page 175-6 of 175-199