Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₁eh₁s-
Proto-Indo-European
Etymology
According to Kloekhorst, the root probably emerged as a reduplication of the root *h₁es- (“to be”). The sense of "to sit" may have emerged from the sense of "to be present."[1] According to the EIEC, who instead reconstruct a Narten-present, the term may have emerged as a lengthened-grade intensive of *h₁es-.
Root
Alternative reconstructions
- *h₁ēs-[4]
Reconstruction notes
- The terms assigned to this root have been derived from an athematic root present,[2] although the EIEC instead opts to assign them to a lengthened-grade Narten present *h₁ḗs-ti.[4]
- According to the linguist Ranko Matasović, this root probably possessed the stative meaning "to be sitting," whereas the root *sed- may have possessed the transitive meaning "to sit."[5]
- Phototactically, this root is slightly unusual, as there are few roots in Proto-Indo-European that possess the same consonant before and after the root vowel. Other roots such as *skek-, *tetḱ-, and *ses- may showcase the same irregularity.[6][7] According to the linguist Paul Cohen, the possible origin of the root as a reduplicated form may disqualify as the form as monomorphemic and therefore allow the term to coexist with a general avoidance of roots with repeated consonants in PIE.[8]
- Hittite [script needed] (āšš-zi, “to remain, stay, to be left”) has been connected to [script needed] (eš-a(ri)), though Kloekhorst rejects this etymology.[9]
Derived terms
Terms derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *h₁eh₁s- (1 c, 0 e)
- *h₁éh₁s-ti (athematic root present)
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Kloekhorst, Alwin (2008), “eš-a(ri)”, in Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 5), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, pages 252-255
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Rix, Helmut, editor (2001), “*h₁eh₁s-”, in Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben [Lexicon of Indo-European Verbs] (in German), 2nd edition, Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag, →ISBN, page 232
- ^ Beekes, Robert S. P. (2010), “ἧμαι”, in Etymological Dictionary of Greek (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 10), with the assistance of Lucien van Beek, Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 518: “*h₁eh₁s- 'sit'”
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Mallory, J. P., Adams, D. Q., editors (1997), “*h₁ēs-”, in Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture, London, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, page 522
- ^ Matasović, Ranko (n. d.), Clause alignment in Proto-Indo-European[1], page 3
- ^ Adam I. Cooper (23 March 2009), “Similarity Avoidance in the Proto-Indo-European Root”, in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium[2], number 8, page 58
- ^ Kogan, L, KosLova, N, Loesov, S, Tishchenko, S, Arkhipov, I., editors (8 September 2016), Babel und Bibel 9: Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Meeting of the International Association for Comparative Semitics and Other Studies[3], Penn State University Press, , →ISBN, page 213
- ^ Cohen, Paul S.; Wald, Benji (31 December 2022), “On the PIE root-structure constraint prohibiting repeated consonants”, in Papers in Historical Phonology[4], volume 7, , →ISSN, pages 130-131
- ^ Kloekhorst, Alwin (2008), “āšš-zi”, in Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 5), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, pages 214-215
Further reading
- Pokorny, Julius (1959), “ĕs-”, in Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch [Indo-European Etymological Dictionary] (in German), volume 1, Bern, München: Francke Verlag, pages 342-343