Reconstruction:Proto-Sino-Tibetan/klaʔ
Proto-Sino-Tibetan
Reconstruction
- Proto-Sino-Tibetan: *gla-k ⪤ *kla-k (Matisoff, 2003)
- Proto-Tibeto-Burman: *kla (Benedict, 1972); *kra and *glak (Sagart, 2006)
Sagart (2006) tries to split this root into *kra "throw down" and *glak "fall", with the former root for reflexes with medial -r- or without final -k and the latter for reflexes with medial -l- or final -k. This split does not actually work due to forms like Karbi klo and Mizo tla with medial -l- but no coda.
The comparison between the Mizo, Karbi, Lepcha, Jingpho and Burmese forms appears in Benedict (1972). A comparison to Chinese 落 appears in Matisoff (2003:480), while Sagart (2006) expands this comparison to Chinese 下 (xià) and also notes a comparison to a Japhug form. This comparison of 下 (xià) to rGyalrongic forms is reinforced in Zhang, Jacques & Lai (2019).
Jacques has demonstrated that the voiceless/voiced transitivity alternation in this root is triggered by a nasal intransitivizing prefix, not an *s- causative prefix, comparing Tangut and Japhug reflexes to the Burmese reflexes.[1]
Verb
*klaʔ
- to fall
Descendants
- Chinese (see there for further descendants)
- rGyalrongic
- West rGyalrongic
- Horpa
- Tangut: 𗒯 (*khji¹), 𘖢 (*gji¹)
- Horpa
- East rGyalrongic
- Japhug: kra (“to cause to fall”), ŋgra (“to fall”)
- West rGyalrongic
- Lolo-Burmese
- Proto-Kuki-Chin: *klaa, *khlaa
- Jingpho-Asakian
- Jingpho: hkrat
- Central Naga
- Ao: tsük
- Karbi: klo
- Lepcha: ᰁᰫ (klú)
References
- ^ Jacques, Guillaume (2014), Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute, Leiden: Brill, →ISBN, page 250