Tapajós (proposed Brazilian state)

Tapajós (Portuguese pronunciation: [tapaˈʒɔs]) was the name for a proposed new Brazilian state, which would consist of the western part of the current state of Pará. Along with a simultaneous proposal to create another state called Carajás from another part of Pará, the proposal was defeated in a referendum in 2011 and by law could not be revived until 2015; as of 2019, no new such proposal has been made. Although voters within the territory of the proposed new states voted strongly in favor, the vote was strongly negative among the much larger population in what would have remained of Pará.

Geography

Protected areas

Municipalities

The new state's largest city and proposed capital would be Santarém. Tapajós would have a population of about 1.3 million and an area of 722,358 square kilometres (278,904 sq mi), comprising 27 out of Pará's 144 municipalities. As of 2011, its GDP of BRL 6.4 billion constituted 11% of the total GDP of Pará. The planned Belo Monte Dam would be located on the border of the territory of Tapajós with either the new, smaller Pará or the also proposed new state of Carajás.

The two most populous municipalities would be Santarém (population 294,774) and Altamira (population 105,030).

List of municipalities in the proposed state

Name ImmGR[a] IntGR[b]
Alenquer Santarém Santarém
Almeirim Almeirim-Porto de Moz Altamira
Altamira Altamira Altamira
Aveiro Itaituba Santarém
Belterra Santarém Santarém
Brasil Novo Altamira Altamira
Curuá Oriximiná Santarém
Faro Oriximiná Santarém
Itaituba Itaituba Santarém
Jacareacanga Itaituba Santarém
Juruti Oriximiná Santarém
Medicilândia Altamira Altamira
Mojuí dos Campos Santarém Santarém
Monte Alegre Santarém Santarém
Novo Progresso Itaituba Santarém
Óbidos Oriximiná Santarém
Oriximiná Oriximiná Santarém
Placas Itaituba Santarém
Porto de Moz Almeirim-Porto de Moz Altamira
Prainha Santarém Santarém
Rurópolis Itaituba Santarém
Santarém Santarém Santarém
Senador José Porfírio Altamira Altamira
Terra Santa Oriximiná Santarém
Trairão Itaituba Santarém
Uruará Altamira Altamira
Vitória do Xingu Altamira Altamira
Notes
  1. ^ Immediate Geographic Region (succeeding unit to the Microregion of Brazil)
  2. ^ Intermediate Geographic Region (succeeding unit to the Mesoregion of Brazil)

Secession movement

2011 referendum

In a referendum held on December 11, 2011, the residents of the entire state of Pará were asked to vote on proposals to split the state into three parts: Tapajós in the west, Carajás in the southeast, and a rump Pará in the northeast. The proposal to create Tapajós was defeated by a margin of 66.1% to 33.9%.[1] Voting was highly polarized regionally, with voters in the territories of the proposed new states voting strongly in favor, while voters in the rump Pará voted strongly against. In particular, more than 90% of voters in Santarém voted in favor, while more than 90% of voters in Pará's capital city of Belém voted against. As Belém and its surrounding area comprise over half the population of the original state, the proposal had no chance of passing.[2] The mayor of Santarém, Maria do Carmo, vowed to continue efforts to create the new state.[3]

2019-present

In 2019, a new request for the division of the state of Pará was filed with the Senate's Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ), with only the state of Tapajós being proposed. The project received a favorable opinion from the rapporteur in the CCJ in November 2021.[4] If approved, it will proceed to analysis in the Chamber of Deputies.[5] In this proposal, 4 municipalities that were in the first movement of 2011 and voted against the creation of the new state in the 2011 Plebiscite were removed: Altamira, Porto de Moz , Senador José Porfírio and Vitória do Xingu .[6]

Feasibility

According to studies by the Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA) (the body responsible for socio-economic studies) on the viability of the new state, the total economic cost of the new federative unit would be R$ 832 million annually.[7]

The study predicts an increase in state public spending in Tapajós by approximately 98%, compromising about 35% of the state's GDP. The cost of running the public administration as a percentage of Tapajós' GDP would then be higher than the national average, which is around 12.74%, making the project unfeasible.[8]

References

  1. ^ "TSE conclui apuração e confirma vitória do "não" no Pará" [Electoral Supreme Court finishes vote count and confirms victory of "no" in Pará]. Folha de S.Paulo (in Portuguese). December 12, 2011. Retrieved December 15, 2011.
  2. ^ Aguirre Talento (December 11, 2011). "Mais de 90% dos eleitores de Marabá e Santarém votaram pela divisão" [Over 90% of voters in Marabá and Santarém voted for the division]. Folha de S.Paulo (in Portuguese). Retrieved December 11, 2011.
  3. ^ Rodrigo Vizeu (December 11, 2011). "Após derrota no plebiscito, Santarém decreta luto oficial" [After defeat in referendum, Santarém decrees official mourning period]. Folha de S.Paulo (in Portuguese). Retrieved December 11, 2011.
  4. ^ "Relator na CCJ do Senado dá parecer favorável a plebiscito sobre a criação do Estado de Tapajós". G1 (in Brazilian Portuguese). 2021-11-17. Retrieved 2025-11-26.
  5. ^ "Estado do Tapajós: entenda o processo que pode levar à criação da 28º unidade da federação no Brasil". G1 (in Brazilian Portuguese). Archived from the original on 2022-09-21. Retrieved 2025-11-26.
  6. ^ "Apenas 4 cidades que integrariam Tapajós votaram contra divisão do PA". Política (in Brazilian Portuguese). 2011-12-12. Archived from the original on 2025-09-12. Retrieved 2025-11-26.
  7. ^ Redação (2011-12-08). "As razões que justificam criar o Estado do Tapajós". Jornal O Impacto (in Brazilian Portuguese). Retrieved 2025-11-26.
  8. ^ "Tapajós e Carajás seriam estados inviáveis, calcula economista do Ipea". Política (in Brazilian Portuguese). 2011-05-08. Archived from the original on 2022-05-19. Retrieved 2025-11-26.

See also

  • Carajás - the other proposed state to be carved out of Pará, with the proposal also defeated in the December 2011 referendum