Mukhtasar al-Tahawi

Mukhtasar al-Tahawi
Cover of the 1950 edition, published by Abul Wafa al-Afghani in Hyderabad
Authoral-Tahawi
Original titleمختصر الطحاوي
LanguageArabic
SubjectFiqh, Hanafi school
Publication date
10th century
Media typePrint
297.1226
LC ClassKBP465 T343 1986

Mukhtasar al-Tahawi (Arabic: مختصر الطحاوي) is a 10th-century classical work on Hanafi jurisprudence authored by al-Tahawi. In this concise book, as indicated by its title Mukhtasar (summary), the author compiles about 460 disputed issues among the three principal Hanafi imams—Abu Hanifa, Abu Yusuf, and Muhammad al-Shaybani—and, to a lesser extent, Zufar. It is regarded as the first work of its kind in Hanafi fiqh literature. A key feature of the book is al-Tahawi's explicit statement of preference (tarjih) in these disagreements. Estimates suggest that about 75% of his rulings in the work do not align with Abu Hanifa, the eponym of the school. The book was published in 1950 by Abul Wafa al-Afghani, based on existing manuscripts.

Composition

At the time of its composition, Mukhtasar al-Tahawi aimed to present the madhhab opinions that had become established in practice up to that period.[1] It covers, for the first time, the fiqh efforts of Abu Hanifa and his students. Al-Tahawi includes the opinions of Abu Hanifa, Abu Yusuf, and Muhammad al-Shaybani, and to a lesser extent, Zufar ibn al-Hudhayl.[2]

In the introduction, al-Tahawi states that he gathered the fundamental issues that must be learned and intended to make it easier for students and teachers to understand the school's views. The work is larger in volume compared to later mukhtasars, though some fundamental issues are not included—for example, the ruling that intention (niyyah) is obligatory in dry ablution (tayammum), which appears in later works. This may be due to the author's style and priorities.[3]

Mukhtasar al-Tahawi is regarded as the first fiqh mukhtasar in the Hanafi school.[4] It was published from existing manuscripts by Abul Wafa al-Afghani in Cairo in 1370 AH (1950–1951 CE) and exists in two versions: al-Mukhtasar al-Kabir and al-Mukhtasar al-Saghir.[4] Its arrangement largely follows Al-Muzani's al-Mukhtasar.[2]

Status

Shortly after its composition, it began to be commented upon (sharh) by Hanafi jurists. The main commentaries are by Al-Jassas (d. 370/980) and Ali ibn Muhammad al-Isfijabi (d. 535/1140). Other commentators include Abu'l-Hasan al-Karkhi (d. 340/952), Abu Abdillah al-Saymari (d. 436/1044), Abu Nasr Ahmad ibn Muhammad al-Akta' al-Baghdadi (d. 474/1081), Abu Nasr Ahmad ibn Mansur al-Isfijabi al-Qadi (d. 480/1087), Al-Sarakhsi (d. 483/1090), Abu Nasr Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Masud al-Wabiri (5th century), Abu'l-Ma'ali Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Hajandi al-Isfijabi (d. 536/1141), and Ibn Kutluboga (d. 879/1474).[5]

Widely circulated Hanafi works such as Al-Mabsut, Tuhfat al-Fuqaha, Bada'i' al-Sana'i', al-Muhit al-Burhani, Fath al-Qadir, al-Inaya, al-Bahr al-Ra'iq, Fatawa 'Alamgiri, and Radd al-Muhtar occasionally reference al-Tahawi's Mukhtasar.[6] These references often note differences in transmitted reports (riwayat) and al-Tahawi's preferences. Comparisons are sometimes made between Mukhtasar al-Tahawi and Imam Muhammad's works, noting where rulings align with Zahir al-Riwaya or differ from al-Asl.[6] Topics such as section naming and order of presentation are also compared with early books.[7]

Mukhtasar al-Tahawi was regarded as a source within the Hanafi school, although the influence of Mukhtasar al-Tahawi in later periods was relatively limited, as indicated by the small number of surviving manuscripts and commentaries. Some scholars, like Shah Abdul Aziz Dehlavi, claimed that the work "did not gain widespread acceptance because al-Tahawi opposed Abu Hanifa on many issues."[6] Other reasons include some fiqh concepts not being fully clarified at the time and al-Tahawi's residence in Egypt. Rather than serving as a primary source of rulings, it was used as a reference for comparing different reports in intra-madhhab debates.[6]

Chapters

Mukhtasar al-Tahawi contains fifty-three chapters. It begins with Kitab al-Tahara (Book of Purification) and then discusses Salat (Prayer), Zakat (Almsgiving), Sawm (Fasting), and Hajj (Pilgrimage). After completing the subjects of worship (ibadat), al-Tahawi starts Kitab al-Buyu (Book of Sales), which deals with transactions (muamalat). Near the end, the book covers topics related to punishments (uqubat) and concludes with other matters connected to legal and financial dealings.[2]

Methodology

In Mukhtasar al-Tahawi, al-Tahawi records the opinions of Abu Hanifa, Abu Yusuf, and Muhammad al-Shaybani on disputed issues within the Hanafi school, while mentioning the views of Zufar ibn al-Hudhayl only when he supports them. He also includes takhreej (deductions) derived from the imams' principles rather than their direct statements.[4]

A distinctive feature of the work is al-Tahawi's consistent expression of preference (tarjih) in nearly all disagreements.[8] He makes preferences in over 460 disputed issues and, when multiple reports exist, applies tarjih al-riwaya (preference between reports). These are usually presented with their sources and sometimes with reasons for his choice. In certain cases, he selects one opinion without detailed comment.[9]

The book's emphasis on disagreements shapes its structure and arrangement. Some legal concepts in the work appear not yet fully developed, and the presentation is not always systematic.[10]

Al-Tahawi generally cites Abu Hanifa's view first, followed by those of Abu Yusuf and Muhammad al-Shaybani, though occasionally one is omitted. His preferred opinions are clearly marked with phrases such as bihi ne'huz, and less often ajwad, ahabbu ilayna, or kama qala.[10]

Statistics

In Mukhtasar al-Tahawi, most of al-Tahawi's preferences favor the common opinions of the two imams (Sahibayn), Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad, when they differ from Abu Hanifa. These make up about one-third of all preferences. The opinions agreed upon by Tarafayn (Abu Hanifa and Imam Muhammad) are preferred in about 40 issues. The views jointly held by Abu Hanifa and Abu Yusuf, called Shaykhayn, are preferred in about 15 issues, and the shared opinions of Imam Muhammad and Zufar appear in around 8 issues.[11]

In matters where the Hanafi imams hold individual views, al-Tahawi prefers the opinions of Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad in about 70 issues each, Abu Hanifa's individual opinion in about 45, and Zufar's in 6. He also expresses his own independent view in six issues, differing from all Hanafi imams.[11]

Al-Tahawi generally preferred the views of Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad over those of Abu Hanifa. The issues in which Abu Hanifa's opinion is supported by one of the other imams make up roughly 25% of the disputed matters, while in about 75% of cases, al-Tahawi prefers an opinion other than Abu Hanifa's.[11]

References

  1. ^ Bulut, Abdurrahman (2018). "Muhtasaru't-tahâvî'ni̇n Hanefî Mezhebi̇ Tari̇hi̇ndeki̇ Yeri̇ne Müelli̇fi̇n Terci̇hleri̇ni̇n Etki̇si̇". Kocaeli İlahiyat Dergisi (in Turkish). 2 (1): 41. ISSN 2564-677X.
  2. ^ a b c Bulut 2018, p. 41.
  3. ^ Bulut 2018, p. 41–42.
  4. ^ a b c İltaş, Davut (1988–2016). "TAHÂVÎ". TDV Encyclopedia of Islam (44+2 vols.) (in Turkish). Istanbul: Turkiye Diyanet Foundation, Centre for Islamic Studies.
  5. ^ Bulut 2018, p. 42.
  6. ^ a b c d Bulut 2018, p. 43.
  7. ^ Gelincik, Aydın (2022). Müzenî ve Tahâvî muhtasarlarında 'Aile hukuku' bölümünün muhteva ve metot açısından mukayesesi (MA thesis) (in Turkish). İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University. p. 37.
  8. ^ Öztürk, Ali (2023). Hanefî mezhebinde muhtasar metinlerin ortaya çıkışı (Şüf'a örneği) (PDF) (PhD thesis). Marmara University. p. 187.
  9. ^ Bulut 2018, p. 45.
  10. ^ a b Bulut 2018, p. 46.
  11. ^ a b c Bulut 2018, p. 47.

Sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.