Khom Sabat Khlon Lamphong

Khom Sabat Khlon Lamphong
ขอมสบาดโขลญลำพง
King of Si Satchanalai–Sukhothai
King of Si SatchanalaiSukhothai
ReignEarly 13th century–1238
PredecessorSri Naw Nam Thum
SuccessorSi Inthrathit
King of Suphannaphum[a]
ReignMid 13th century
PredecessorVacant
SuccessorUthong III[a]
DiedLate 13th century
Suphan Buri[a]
ConsortPrincess of Mueang Tritrueng[a]
IssueUthong III[a]
HouseSuphannaphum dynasty[a]

Khom Sabat Khlon Lamphong (Thai: ขอมสบาดโขลญลำพง) was a 13th-century monarch attested in the Wat Si Chum Inscription as the ruler of SukhothaiSi Satchanalai.[2]: 58 [3] Earlier scholarship identified him as a Khmer noble appointed by Angkor to administer the region;[4] however, more recent interpretations propose that he was a kinsman of his predecessor, Sri Naw Nam Thum, and nevertheless maintained political affiliations with Lavo.[2]: 58 [4]

Khomsabat Khlon Lamphong succeeded Sri Naw Nam Thum, either following the latter's death or through forcible usurpation.[2]: 58 [3] Subsequently, he was deposed in 1238 by a coalition force led by Si Inthrathit, the ruler of Mueang Bang Yang (son of Candraraja, the former sovereign of Sukhothai) together with Pha Mueang, a Tai Lueang (ไทเลือง) monarch of Mueang Rat.[5]: 195–196  Following Khomsabat Khlon Lamphong's deposition, Si Inthrathit was enthroned as the new ruler. This event has been conventionally interpreted in historiography as marking the formal inception of the early Siamese polity;[5]: 195–196  nevertheless, various historical records attest that the Siamese had already exercised political authority over Sukhothai prior to this episode.[b]

On etymological grounds, certain scholars have identified Khom Sabat Khlon Lamphong with Thao Saen Pom,[1] a legendary figure reputed to have married a Tai Yuan princess of Mueang Tritrueng[11][12] and subsequently migrated southward to assume the vacant throne of Suphannaphum around the mid-13th century.[13]: 60–1  His successor, Uthong (III), is said to have consolidated dynastic authority in the region and later established a royal alliance with the Siamese polity at Ayodhya through the marriage of his daughter to Uthong (V), the first monarch of the Ayutthaya Kingdom. This lineage is generally identified in later historiography as the Suphannaphum dynasty.[13]: 61 

Etymology

According to the Surin Khmer dialect, the term Khom Sabat Khlon Lamphong literally denotes “the Khom afflicted with a condition of innumerable nodules upon the feet.” An analysis of the constituent morphemes suggests that the term functions as a descriptive epithet—referring to an individual by physical characteristics—rather than as an official title or rank. The expression can be segmented into three components: Khom + Sabat Khlon + Lamphong, each of which conveys the following meanings:[1]

  • Khom signifies “a Khom person.”
  • Sabat Khlon may be further divided into Sabat and Khlon. The term Sabat, when reconstructed into Old Siamese–Khmer phonology, appears as sbaek (ซแบ๊ย์ก), meaning “skin” or “surface.” The term Khlon, similarly reconstructed as khluon (คลวน) or khluan (คลูน), denotes “body” or “form.” Combined, Sabat Khlon therefore signifies “skin of the body” or simply “skin.”
  • Lamphong, reconstructed as Lampuong (ลำป็วง) in Old Siamese–Khmer pronunciation, carries two possible meanings: first, “a protrusion or small swelling upon a surface,” and second, “a species of climbing plant bearing small, smooth, round fruits, approximately the size of a fingertip; the fruits are dark green when unripe and black when ripe, and are edible.”

When this linguistic interpretation in the Surin Khmer dialect is compared with the legend of Thao Saen Pom (“Lord of a Thousand Nodules”), a striking correspondence emerges. The legendary figure Thao Saen Pom appears to be identical with the historical personage referred to as Khomsabat Khlon Lamphong, thus suggesting that the name encapsulates a descriptive reference to his distinctive physical condition rather than denoting a formal royal designation.[1]

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f If Khom Sabat Khlon Lamphong is identified with the legendary Thao Saen Pom,[1]
  2. ^ It is well attested that Si Inthrathit’s father, Candraraja,[6]: 11–7  together with Sri Naw Nam Thum[7]: 115 [8]: 17  and Pra Poa Noome Thele Seri,[9][10]: 127  had previously established their authority over Sukhothai at a time preceding 1238 CE.

References

  1. ^ a b c d Singkhaselit, Katitham (2018). Phasa Khamen Mueang Surin ภาษาเขมรเมืองสุรินทร์ [Khmer Surin language] (in Thai). pp. 12–3.
  2. ^ a b c Sukpanit, Khajon (1978). Kham Banyai Prawattisat Thai Por Sor 1600–2310 คำบรรยายประวัติศาสตร์ไทย พ.ศ. 1600-2310 [Description of Thai history, 1600-2310 B.E.]. Bangkok: Department of History, Srinakharinwirot University Prasarnmit.
  3. ^ a b "การศึกษาพัฒนาการทางสังคมก่อนสมัยสุโขทัยในจังหวัดสุโขทัย: กรณีศึกษาพื้นที่เมืองเชลียง-ศรีสัชนาลัย" [A study of pre-Sukhothai social development in Sukhothai Province: A case study of Mueang Cheliang-Sri Satchanalai area]. Fine Arts Department. 2023. Archived from the original on 2023-03-15. Retrieved 18 December 2024.
  4. ^ a b Sujit Wongthes (28 April 2019). "ขอมสบาดโขลญลำพง 'ไม่เขมร' กำเนิดรัฐสุโขทัย จากจารึกวัดศรีชุม" [“Khom Sabat Khlon Lamphong” as ‘Non-Khmer’: The Origins of the Sukhothai State According to the Wat Si Chum Inscription]. Matichon (in Thai). Archived from the original on 2025-11-12. Retrieved 12 November 2025.
  5. ^ a b Coedès, George (1968). Walter F. Vella (ed.). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Translated by Cowing, Susan Brown. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-0368-1.
  6. ^ Fine Arts Department, ed. (1968) [First published in Thai in 1912.]. Khamhaikan Chao Krung Kao Khamhaikan Khun Luang Ha Wat Lae Phra Ratcha Pongsawadarn Krung Kao Chabab Luang Luang Prasoet Aksorn คำให้การชาวกรุงเก่า คำให้การขุนหลวงหาวัด และ พระราชพงศาวดารกรุงเก่าฉบับหลวงประเสริฐอักษรนิติ์ [Testimony of the King Who Entered a Wat, Testimony of the Inhabitants of the Old Capital, and Royal Chronicle of the Old Capital: Luang Prasoet Aksorn Version] (PDF) (in Thai). Bangkok: Rung Rueang Tham. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 April 2023. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
  7. ^ Na Nakhon, Prasert (1998), เรื่องเกี่ยวกับศิลาจารึกสุโขทัย [Stories Related To The Sukhothai Stone Inscriptions] (PDF) (Thesis) (in Thai), Bangkok: Kasetsart University, pp. 110–223, ISBN 974-86374-6-8, retrieved 30 October 2024
  8. ^ "หลักที่ 2 ศิลาจารึกวัดศรีชุม" (PDF) (in Thai). Ramkhamhaeng University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2021. Retrieved 29 August 2023.
  9. ^ Simon de La Loubère (1693). "Du royaume de Siam". ota.bodleian.ox.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2025-09-08. Retrieved 8 September 2025.
  10. ^ Michael Smithies; Dhiravat na Pombejra (2022). "Instructions Given to the Siamese Envoys Sent to Portugal, 1684" (PDF). Journal of the Siam Society. 90 (Part 1 & 2).
  11. ^ Chuangphitak, Prangphanan (5 October 2019). "ท้าวแสนปม : จากปมตำนานสู่ปมประวัติศาสตร์" [Thao Saen Pom: From Mythical Enigma to Historical Inquiry] (in Thai). Archived from the original on 2025-08-04. Retrieved 12 November 2025.
  12. ^ Bunnag, Rome (3 February 2016). "ร.๖ ทรงวินิจฉัย "ท้าวแสนปม" เรื่องปาฏิหาริย์เหลือเชื่อ ซ่อนความจริงที่เป็นไปได้ไว้!!!" [King Rama VI’s Assessment of “Thao Saen Pom”: Extraordinary Miracles and the Concealment of Plausible Historical Truths]. Manager Daily (in Thai). Archived from the original on 2025-11-12. Retrieved 12 November 2025.
  13. ^ a b David K. Wyatt (2020). "Relics, Oaths and Politics in Thirteenth-Century Siam". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 32 (1): 3–65. JSTOR 20072298. Archived from the original on 13 April 2025.