2025 Czech government Bitcoin scandal

The 2025 Czech government Bitcoin scandal is a controversy in the Czech Republic revealed by independent Slovak daily newspaper and digital content outlet Denník N that the Ministry of Justice accepted a bitcoin donation worth one billion crowns (approximately $40 million euros) from Tomáš Jiřikovský, who has been convicted in 2017 of embezzlement, drug trafficking and illegal possession of weapons.[1][2][3]

The bitcoin wallets were seized in 2016, although that fact had not been known to the investigative journalist at the time of reporting the controversy in 2025.

After being released early from prison in 2021 via the Czech court system, he began attempts to retrieve the bitcoin now much more valuable . In 2023 he enlisted the help of a lawyer acquainted with the Justice Minister to help get back the seized electronics containing the bitcoin wallets.[4]

Deník N. reported the suspicious bitcoin transfer to the Czech Ministry of Justice in 2025.[5] auditors found that the Ministry was notified by the donor’s lawyer by May 26, 2025 at the latest that the bitcoin had been seized yet still continued to provide instructions a few days later.[6]

Justice Minister Pavel Blažek, a member of the Civic Democratic Party, had resigned on 31 May 2025. Blažek stated that he had approved the donation without verifying its origin but denied that his actions were illegal.[7] The donation was not returned.

On June 18, 2025, 98 of the 192 MPs[8] voted no to a no-confidence motion against the government of Prime Minister Petr Fiala, filed by opposition party ANO. It was the fourth vote the Fiala government survived since he came into power in 2021.

Background

The controversy centers around a donation of 468 bitcoin made to the Czech Ministry of Justice by Tomáš Jiříkovský, a convicted criminal known for operating the dark web marketplace Sheep Marketplace, which was used for illegal transactions.[9][10] Jiříkovský was convicted in 2017 for offenses including embezzlement, drug trafficking, and illegal arms possession. After his release from prison in 2021, he sought to reclaim the bitcoin seized during his arrest. Later, he donated 30% of these assets to the Ministry of Justice.[11][12][13][14]

Public disclosure

The case was uncovered by Zdislava Pokorná from Deník N, who published an article on 28 May 2025 listing Tomáš Jiřikovský among the wealthiest Czechs, with an estimated net worth of approximately two billion Czech koruna (CZK). Jiřikovský was released from prison in 2021 after serving part of a nine-year sentence for embezzlement, illegal arms possession, and drug trafficking. He operated Sheep Marketplace, a darknet platform for drug sales, facilitating transactions involving various illicit substances. Sheep Marketplace used bitcoin as currency, which kept vendors and consumers pseudonymous. Jiřikovský earned substantial profits through commissions on each transaction. While running the marketplace, he was defrauded of 5,400 bitcoins by Nathan Gibson and Sean Mackert, who exploited a vulnerability in the marketplace's source code.[15] In December 2013, they managed to steal nearly 841 Bitcoins from buyers and sellers on the platform,[16] equivalent to over 16 million Czech koruna at that time, which adjusted for inflation would amount to around 22-24 million Czech koruna in 2025.

Bitcoin confiscation

Seizure and disclosure

The National Headquarters Against Organized Crime (NCOZ) seized the first 50 bitcoins on April 4, 2025; however, the Ministry of Justice did not officially learn of this until May 26, when Jiřikovský's lawyer, Kárim Titz, sent the seizure protocol to the ministry. The Ministry of Justice reportedly experienced urgent internal communications regarding the bitcoin's legal status and origin verification. A chronological overview published by Eva Decroix describes a panic at the Ministry. The case was made public on May 28, 2025.[17]

Sale of seized bitcoins

Kirill Juran, the legal representative of two clients who received the bitcoins from the state, said that the clients did not receive any information from the state regarding the origin of the cryptocurrency coins. The purchase agreement did not contain information about the addresses from which the bitcoins originated. The clients did not receive the full amount from the state on June 11, 2025. Juran pointed out that the state did not want to issue another purchase agreement to complete the transfer of the entire amount. At the same time, he criticized the statement that no one had been harmed in the case, because in his opinion, the people who bought bitcoins from the state were the most harmed. He did not rule out legal proceedings against the state for the damage incurred, which he estimated at half a billion Czech koruna at a price of USD 200,000 per 1 BTC.[18]

According to Juran, his clients did not know beforehand which bitcoin addresses the coins would arrive from. If his clients sued the state for "defective performance," he believes it would create a new form of Czech case law. In an interview with Echo24, Juran confirmed that on June 16, 2025, the state was in default on a payment of 60 BTC. Juran described the publication of the names of his clients and Jiřikovský's family members in the Czech media as "completely outrageous."[19]

Concerns over origin and legality

Decroix noticed in three legal opinions that the state should not dispose of the bitcoins remaining with the Ministry of Justice from unfinished auctions. The lawyers justified their opinions by citing the increased risk that the coins originate from criminal activity. Two law firms identified the dark net marketplace Nucleus Market as the source of the bitcoins.[20] The buyers complained to the office about possible defects in the bitcoins and called on it to deliver bitcoins that are legally sound. Juran's clients had purchased 160 bitcoins from the state at auction but failed to receive delivery. Juran quantified their damages (including the purchase price paid but not fulfilled, plus statutory interest) at tens of millions of Czech koruna, contrasting sharply with Decroix's earlier statements that no one had been harmed.[21][22] The legal representative of the two buyers argued for the delivery of bitcoins to his clients on the grounds that no one had disputed the validity of the purchase agreement. He stated that his clients wanted bitcoins without defects. When asked whether the ministry would have to purchase new "clean bitcoins" to satisfy the persons represented, Juran replied, "That is the ministry's problem. When we conclude a contract for a thousand rolls, you don't need to care where I get them. But you want rolls that are neither hard nor mouldy."[23]

Further confiscation and negotiations

Journalist Petra Jamořská pointed out that if the illegal origin of the bitcoins is proven, any form of financial settlement between the state and Juran's clients will result in financial losses for the state. Juran said that the dispute could be resolved by the end of August 2025. In the event that the state fails to deliver the bitcoins, Juran did not rule out another lawsuit.[23]

The remaining undelivered bitcoins were confiscated by law enforcement on August 15, 2025. Juran compared the police seizure to “throwing a grenade” into buyer negotiations. His clients learned of the seizure from the ministry, not the police. Juran initially expected an agreement with the state within two weeks of Jiřikovský’s arrest but later changed his view, citing the seizure by NCOZ officers as the cause. The buyers’ lawyer said his clients could reach an agreement with the state by the end of September 2025, when it should be clear whether a deal is possible. The third buyer acquiring bitcoin from the state at auction was the Sigil cryptocurrency fund, managed by Pavel Stehno in August 2025. Stehno said of the negotiations with the state, "The negotiations are constructive, no one is confiscating anything from us."[24]

Effects on the blockchain

Editor Martin Drtina, from the website Lupa.cz, traced blockchain activity related to the scandal and identified a previously dormant wallet associated with the Nucleus marketplace, which became active in March 2025 and started making transactions during those two days. Furthermore, the editor clarified the identity of the expert from the donation agreement as Jiří Berger. On March 7, 2025, between 9 am and 12 pm, exactly 0.468 BTC was transferred to a Trezor T hardware wallet owned by the Office for the Representation of the State in Property Matters. Later that same day, a total of 468 BTC was sent from the same address in four separate transactions. 22 minutes after the notary's record was completed, an additional 151 BTC was transferred from the same address to other addresses, where, apart from another trio of transfers, they remain to this day. According to Drtina, he clearly demonstrated that the individual who transferred the funds to the state controlled all wallets connected to the Nucleus marketplace.[25]

In the third chronological analysis, Drtina proved that after Jiřikovský's arrest and the house search on April 12, 2016, a third person (or group of persons) transferred funds from Nucleus wallets the following night.[26] In the fourth text, Drtina found that someone had been trying to exchange the bitcoin from this day's donation on Czech and foreign cryptocurrency exchanges, including the Kraken exchange. The unknown owners of the cryptocurrency wallets were trying to regroup the coins using mixers (tools on the bitcoin blockchain that make it difficult to trace where the individual coins come from).[27]

Minister's resignation and political fallout

Justice Minister Pavel Blažek accepted the donation without thoroughly investigating its origins.[1] He later stated that he believed it to be an act of repentance by Jiříkovský and did not anticipate any legal complications. However, the lack of due diligence prompted public criticism and allegations of potential money laundering. Facing mounting pressure and seeking to avoid further damage to the government's reputation, Blažek resigned on May 30, 2025.[28][29]

The scandal intensified political tensions, with opposition parties calling for additional resignations, including those of Prime Minister Petr Fiala and Finance Minister Zbyněk Stanjura, alleging they were aware of the donation and its questionable origins.[30][13]

On 19 June 2025, the government survived a no-confidence vote triggered by the scandal.[31]

Ongoing investigations

The High Prosecutor's Office in Olomouc has initiated an investigation into the case, examining potential charges of abuse of official authority and money laundering. The police's organized crime unit is also involved in probing the circumstances surrounding the donation and its acceptance by the Ministry.[28][30] Officials at the National Organized Crime Control Center have requested the cooperation of the FBI to jointly investigate Jiříkovský's connection to the dark web marketplace Nucleus Market. On June 11, 2025, an internal audit committee of the Financial Analysis Authority reviewed the FAA's handling of the case and concluded that the FAA's procedures had been followed correctly.

On June 5, 2025, Neovlivni.cz wrote that Jiříkovský had traveled to Asia, which he was able to do because he was not accused of anything at that time. Later, it was discovered that he was in Taiwan. Jiříkovský stated that he intended to return in the second half of June.[32]

Reactions

Domestic

Czech political analyst Lukáš Valeš described the Czech Republic as a "banana republic" to the foreign press.[33] Another political analyst, Jan Kubáček, commented on the case saying, "The state administration is either incompetent or unethical." Kubáček disliked the government's unclear communication about the situation and unprofessionalism among government officials. During an interview with CNN Prima News, Kubáček criticized the slow manner in which the case was handled by Petr Fiala and said that the case could be characterized as one of the "demons of the 1990s".[34] Kubáček mentioned that STAN's departure from Fiala's government would either be expected by voters or necessary for the party to clarify its position against ministers from ODS. Political analyst Josef Mlejnek expressed the opinion that the case will weaken both the electoral coalition Spolu and Fiala himself.[35] "I never dreamed it was possible. That the Justice Ministry would take and legalize money from a convicted person without knowing the origin of that money," political scientist Vladimíra Dvořáková commented on the case.[36]

Government stability and leadership concerns

Political analyst Daniel Šárovec suggested that Blažek, Fiala, and Stanjura had underestimated the legal and reputational risks of accepting the donation without proper verification. Šárovec noted that the case has the potential to undermine the legitimacy of the government. He then pointed out that interior minister Vít Rakušan's statement about remaining in Fiala's cabinet is limited to "right here and right now." He speculated that the political leaders were prompted for their word because they wanted to buy time. Šárovec noted that Eva Decroix, who replaced Blažek as justice minister, was merely a "bridging minister."[34]

Media commentary and historical comparisons

Political commentator Thomas Kulidakis drew parallels to previous ODS scandals, including the controversial coupon privatization scheme and allegations against former advisor to the Prime Minister Nagyová.[37] Political commentator Kateřina Perknerová described the case as an event with an unusual number of coincidences. Journalist Petr Honzejk commented on Blažek's departure from his post as minister, saying that there was no society-wide catharsis that would restore trust in politics.[38] Publicist David Klimeš commented on the development of the case, saying that the public now had more comprehensive information. He also expressed the opinion that the story of the banana republic—the Czech Republic—is unfolding.[39]

Allegations of prior knowledge and internal communications

Commentator Miroslav Korecký highlighted communications between Decroix and Blažek regarding Deputy Dvořák's emails, suggesting prior knowledge of the donation. The email was supposed to prove that Dvořák should have known about the whole case from the beginning. Korecký used the phrase "the shredders will go there" for the supposed developments at the Ministry of Justice. He also expressed his conviction that neither TOP 09 nor KDU-ČSL could leave the cabinet because they were on the brink of dissolution. He described Fiala's TV appearance as the speech of a "communist papal."[40]

Public opinion and electoral impact

Pavel Rychetský described the case as the cause of the upheaval in public opinion and the decline in popular support for the SPOLU coalition.[41] He denied that Jiřikovský's actions were entirely charitable. He also pointed out that, as of 28 June 2025, the state's consideration for the financial donation was still unknown. Political commentator Jindřich Šídlo warned that inadequate media explanation of cryptocurrency terminology and technical concepts hindered public understanding of the scandal's significance.[41]

Reactions of Czech politicians

Minister of Agriculture Marek Výborný (KDU-ČSL) said that Czechs are far more interested in affordable housing than in the bitcoin scandal. Interior Minister Vít Rakušan (STAN) said that he did not intend to overthrow the government of Petr Fiala at the start of June 2025. Subsequently, Rakušan described Eva Decroix's (ODS) statement that Deputy Minister Karel Dvořák (STAN) was implicated because Decroix knew about the donation in advance as an effort to cast suspicion on as many officials as possible. MEP Jan Farský (STAN) initially supported Rakušan's more conciliatory tone towards remaining in Fiala's cabinet. Later Farský did not rule out a possible departure of STAN from Fiala's government. Farský also called for a 14-day ultimatum for ODS members to explain the case as a whole.[42] "The bitcoin case of Minister Blažek is a disgrace with the potential to jeopardize the Czech Republic's credit rating. It damages trust at home and abroad," said MEP Danuše Nerudová (STAN). According to participants, tensions between ODS and STAN coalition partners surfaced during a meeting on June 10, 2025, where Prime Minister Fiala reportedly left the room multiple times, apparently distressed by the scandal's political implications.[43]

Andrej Babiš, the chairman of the opposition ANO 2011 movement, commented on the case, saying that it was a criminal act that bore the hallmarks of money laundering by the state.[44] He described the case as the biggest corruption scandal in the history of the Czech Republic.[45] Babiš expressed the opinion that by dismissing Blažek, ODS representatives made Don Pablo of Brno (the media nickname of Blažek) a metaphorical scapegoat. Subsequently, Babiš gave a speech in France on Monday, June 10, 2025. Speaking in French at an event of the European faction Patriots for Europe, Babiš accused the Fiala cabinet of corruption in connection with the bitcoin scandal.[46] Alena Schillerová, chairwoman of the ANO 2011 parliamentary club, commented on the case by saying that the ministers shook hands with the mafia.[47]

Reaction of the Czech public

The bitcoin scandal did not affect the electoral preferences of the SPOLU coalition. According to the director of the STEM agency, Jaromír Mazák, this happened because people need more time to form their own opinions on more complex cases, or because the voters of SPOLU view Blažek's resignation as a sufficient response to the case.[48] According to another survey of voter preferences, the electoral core and potential remained stable after the outbreak of the case. Analysts compiling the IPSOS election survey up to 1 June 2025 stated that the predicted election result of the SPOLU coalition was within the statistical margin of error. Data scientists from Median found that for almost 30% of the original voters of the SPOLU coalition, the scandal has been the primary reason for the fall of the government of Petr Fiala.[49]

Representatives of the Czech non-profit organization Milion chvilek pro demokracii said in their statement on the Bitcoin case that they appreciated the efforts of the new Minister Decroix to conduct a transparent investigation into the case. They criticized the lack of concrete steps in dealing with the case.[50] Earlier, the "momentarians" pointed out that the case is an opportunity to test the personal credibility of Fiala and called for "political accountability" for Finance Minister Stanjura.[51]

According to a survey by the STEM agency, two-thirds of Czechs considered the case to be serious in the second half of June 2025. In response to the case, the SPOLU coalition began to lose electoral support. According to STEM analysts, the more serious cases can be expected to have a more gradual effect over time.

Journalists from the Seznam Zprávy newsroom accessed an internal poll of electoral preferences commissioned by the SPOLU coalition. The poll shows that the coalition has lost the support of its disappointed supporters from the last election because of the case. Sociologist Jan Herzmann commented on the poll: "The case has definitely given SPOLU a leg up in its quest for electoral victory."[52] A third of the coalition's original voters agreed on the need for other ministers to resign. One in five of the coalition's original voters wanted Fiala's cabinet to fall.

International

Editors of Politico predicted that the case may help Andrej Babiš win the upcoming parliamentary elections. Petr Kaniok, a university teacher from Masaryk University, told the server that government politicians managed to cover up the case because Blažek resigned as minister.[53] The journalist Jan Lopatka noted for Reuters that Fiala's government should not face a vote of no confidence because it held a majority of 104 MPs.[54] The AP journalists said that the then-government opposition accused the government of money laundering.[28] The journalist Jean-Baptiste Chastand of the French daily Le Monde noted the shift in government officials' communication from "giving money away for free" to Blažek's removal from office.[11] The motive of fear of the Czech Republic's failure as a money-laundering state was elaborated on by Aneta Zachová for the European news website Euractiv, who shared President Petr Pavel's concerns about the weakening trust in rule of law.[55]

The journalist Anton Filippov from the Ukrainian newspaper European Pravda stated that the case could jeopardize Czech assistance in the war in Ukraine. He further speculated about the weakening of Fiala within ODS and the possibility of him being replaced by Martin Kuba, which would lead to unpredictable changes in the relationship between Ukraine and the Czech Republic.[56] The editor Albin Sybera of the German agency bne IntelliNews noted Zbyněk Stanjura's reluctance to resign from the position of Minister of Finance after the scandal, even though Blažek had informed him about the donation in advance.[57] Sybera also quoted the Czech economist Richard Hindls, referencing his interview with Czech Radio. Hindls stated that this type of transaction involving cryptocurrencies, including their sale at a state auction, would not be possible in the private sector due to state regulation.[58]

References

  1. ^ a b "Czech government faces no-confidence vote over bitcoin scandal". Reuters. June 12, 2025. Retrieved August 12, 2025.
  2. ^ "Czech police probe convict's €40 mln gift to justice ministry". TVP World. Retrieved October 4, 2025.
  3. ^ "Denik N: Finance minister warned justice minister against accepting dodgy bitcoins". Radio Prague International. June 2, 2025. Retrieved December 19, 2025.
  4. ^ Weissová, Soňa (June 5, 2025). "Česká novinárka Pokorná vysvetľuje kauzu bitcoinov: Nerozumiem, ako si mohli myslieť, že je to legálne". Denník N (in Slovak). Retrieved December 19, 2025.
  5. ^ "Denik N: Finance minister warned justice minister against accepting dodgy bitcoins". Radio Prague International. June 2, 2025. Retrieved December 19, 2025.
  6. ^ "České ministerstvo spravodlivosti zadávalo pokyny na prevod darovaných bitcoinov ich dražiteľom aj po tom, čo vtedajší minister Pavel Blažek vedel o podozreniach". Denník N (in Slovak). September 1, 2025. Retrieved December 19, 2025.
  7. ^ "Czech Justice Minister Resigns Over Bitcoin Scandal". Coinpaper. June 2, 2025. Retrieved August 4, 2025.
  8. ^ "Czech government survives no-confidence vote over bitcoin scandal". POLITICO. June 18, 2025. Retrieved December 19, 2025.
  9. ^ Pohanka, Vít (June 2, 2025). "Bitcoin scandal shakes Czech government as opposition pushes for no-confidence vote". Czech Radio. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
  10. ^ "Czech Justice Minister Pavel Blažek has resigned over a 468 Bitcoin donation linked to convicted drug trafficker". Expats.cz. May 31, 2025. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
  11. ^ a b Chastand, Jean-Baptiste (May 31, 2025). "Czech justice minister resigns after accepting €40 million in bitcoin from convicted criminal". Le Monde. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
  12. ^ "Czech police probe convict's €40 mln gift to justice ministry". Telewizja Polska. May 30, 2025. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
  13. ^ a b Lazarová, Daniela (June 3, 2025). "Czech PM calling National Security Council meeting over suspect bitcoin transaction". Czech Radio. Retrieved June 4, 2025.
  14. ^ "Czech government survives no-confidence motion over bitcoin scandal". June 18, 2025.
  15. ^ "Middle District of Florida | More Than $1.7 Million In Forfeited Funds Presented To Law Enforcement Agencies | United States Department of Justice". www.justice.gov. January 17, 2018. Retrieved December 5, 2025.
  16. ^ "Miliardář z tržiště. Příběh zámečníka, který daroval miliardu v bitcoinech - Seznam Zprávy". www.seznamzpravy.cz (in Czech). May 30, 2025. Retrieved December 8, 2025.
  17. ^ Kropáček, Jiří (June 18, 2025). "Nový milník časové osy: Vymlčené varování, které mohlo zastavit Blažka". Seznam Zprávy. Seznam. Retrieved September 6, 2025.
  18. ^ "12. června". Události, komentáře. Czech Television. June 12, 2025. Retrieved September 6, 2025.
  19. ^ "Poslali státu stovky tisíc, nedostali plnění. Co mají dělat ti, co koupili bitcoiny z kauzy Blažek?". Echo Podcasty. Echo Media. June 16, 2025. Retrieved September 6, 2025.
  20. ^ ČTK (July 11, 2025). "Bitcoiny nevyužívejte, radí advokáti ministerstvu Evy Decroix. Je vysoké riziko, že jsou z trestné činnosti". iROZHLAS. Czech Radio. Retrieved September 6, 2025.
  21. ^ Novák, Daniel (June 13, 2025). "Ministerstvo nám dluží bitcoiny. Ať je pošle, říkají kupci z "Blažkovy aukce"". Seznam Zprávy. Seznam. Retrieved September 6, 2025.
  22. ^ Vávra, Jan (July 25, 205). "Další past v bitcoinové kauze? Růst ceny kryptoměny zadělává na problém". e15. CZECH NEWS CENTER. Retrieved September 6, 2025.
  23. ^ a b Jaroměřská, Petra (August 13, 2025). "Stát musí sehnat jiné bitcoiny, než má od Jiřikovského. Jinak mu hrozí žaloba". Aktuálně.cz. Economia. Retrieved September 6, 2025.
  24. ^ "Trust Format for Bitcoin Wealth Planning" (PDF). Dearkkamperland. October 30, 2025. Retrieved October 30, 2025.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  25. ^ Drtina, Martin (June 2, 2025). "Spící peněženka z bitcoinové kauzy obživla jen na dva dny. Miliardy z ní mizely před darem i po něm". Lupa.cz (in Czech). Internet Info. Retrieved June 9, 2025.
  26. ^ Drtina, Martin (June 9, 2025). "Záhada Bitcoinů v pohybu: z peněženek Nuclea odcházely i v noci po dealerově zatčení". Lupa.cz (in Czech). Internet Info. Retrieved August 28, 2025.
  27. ^ Drtina, Martin (June 19, 2025). "Bitcoiny může stát stopnout jen při pokusech o jejich oficiální směnu". Lupa.cz (in Czech). Internet Info. Retrieved August 28, 2025.
  28. ^ a b c "Czech justice minister resigns over a donated bitcoin scandal". apnews.com. Associated Press. May 30, 2025. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
  29. ^ Zachová, Aneta (June 2, 2025). "Czech Justice Minister Pavel Blažek resigns amid bitcoin scandal". Euractiv.com. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
  30. ^ a b "Czech Justice Minister resigns over bitcoin scandal amid political fallout". Expats.cz. May 31, 2025. Retrieved June 3, 2025.
  31. ^ "Czech coalition government survives no-confidence vote over bitcoin scandal". AP News. Associated Press. June 19, 2025.
  32. ^ Slonková, Sabina (June 5, 2025). "Hlavní aktér bitcoinové aféry zmizel. Je v Asii". Neovlivni.cz (in Czech). Dead Line Media s.r.o. Retrieved June 18, 2025.
  33. ^ Šilhán, Petr (June 2, 2025). "Valeš k bitcoinové kauze: Česko je jako banánová republika. STAN je rád za odvedení pozornosti". CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. Retrieved July 30, 2025.
  34. ^ a b "Pozor na "démony z devadesátek", varuje Kubáček Spolu. Mohou Starostové držet trumfy?". CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. June 9, 2025. Retrieved July 30, 2025.
  35. ^ Frouzová, Kateřina (May 30, 2025). "Bitcoinová aféra oslabí Spolu i Fialu, říká politolog. Premiérovi přinese hned dva problémy". Deník N (in Czech). N Media. Retrieved July 30, 2025.
  36. ^ Senková, Zita (June 2, 2025). "Politoložka Dvořáková: Blažkovo přijetí bitcoinů je absurdní. Skandál může být obrovských rozměrů". Czech Radio (in Czech). Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  37. ^ Dyntr, Josef (June 4, 2025). "Bitcoiny vládním "strejdům z Brna" nic neříkají, myslí si komentátoři". iDNES.cz (in Czech). Mafra. Retrieved July 30, 2025.
  38. ^ Honzejk, Petr (May 31, 2025). "Petr Honzejk: Bitcoinová kauza Pavla Blažka ničí volební šance Spolu". Český rozhlas plus (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved July 30, 2025.
  39. ^ Hartmann, Petr (June 23, 2025). "Petr Hartman: Bitcoinová kauza zatím neposlala Spolu ke dnu". Český rozhlas Plus (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved July 30, 2025.
  40. ^ "Korecký: Kalousek si musí rvát vlasy. Kdyby založil stranu, voliče by teď rýžoval ve velkém". CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. June 22, 2025. Retrieved July 30, 2025.
  41. ^ a b "Bitcoinová kauza? "Dar musel být spojen s požadavkem protislužby"". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). June 29, 2025. Retrieved July 30, 2025.
  42. ^ Mašková, Martina; Kadeřábková, Johana (June 10, 2025). "Chceme do 14 dnů vědět, jak se kauza s bitcoiny odehrála. ODS to musí vysvětlit všem, volá Farský". Czech Radio (in Czech). Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  43. ^ Stuchlíková, Lucie; Dolejší, Václav (June 11, 2025). "Rozčílený Fiala se uklidňoval za dveřmi. Jak probíhalo jednání mezi STAN a ODS". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  44. ^ Müller, Matyáš (June 11, 2025). "Česká vláda spolupracovala s mafií, křičela ve Sněmovně Schillerová". iDNES.cz (in Czech). Mafra. Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  45. ^ Vašek, Petr; Jelínková, Kristýna; Gričová, Andrea; Kořénková, Tereza (June 11, 2025). "Sněmovní debatu opět ovládla bitcoinová kauza. Poslanci nic neprojednali". ČT24 (in Czech). Czech News Agency. Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  46. ^ Machová, Dominika (June 12, 2025). "Ubohost, dělá ostudu v celé EU. Pospíšila nadzvedla Babišova slova na sjezdu Patriotů pro Evropu". Forum24 (in Czech). Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  47. ^ Cigánek, Lukáš (June 11, 2025). "Hrozné, smutné a tragické, rozvášnila se Schillerová. Politici si podle ní podali ruku s mafií". CNN Prima News (in Czech). FTV Prima. Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  48. ^ "Nový volební model: Bitcoinová kauza koalici Spolu zatím nepoškodila". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Czech News Agency. June 8, 2025. Retrieved June 28, 2025.
  49. ^ Kučerová, Barbora (June 5, 2025). "Průzkum: Třetina voličů Spolu po bitcoinové aféře nevěří vládě". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved June 28, 2025.
  50. ^ "Stanovisko Milionu chvilek ke kauze Pavla Blažka a tzv. bitcoinové aféře". Milion chvilek pro demokracii (in Czech). June 11, 2025. Retrieved June 28, 2025.
  51. ^ Kolář, Petr (June 3, 2025). "Milion chvilek kritizuje Fialu. Tohle je vaše zkouška důvěryhodnosti, apeluje". iDNES.cz (in Czech). Mafra. Retrieved June 28, 2025.
  52. ^ Stuchlíková, Lucie (June 24, 2025). "Bitcoinová kauza odrazuje Spolu ty voliče, které potřebuje získat nejvíc". Seznam Zprávy (in Czech). Retrieved June 28, 2025.
  53. ^ Jochecová, Ketrin (June 2, 2025). "Drug dealer bitcoin scandal risks upending Czech election". politico.eu. Retrieved June 8, 2025.
  54. ^ Lopatka, Jan (June 3, 2025). "Czech government set to face no-confidence vote in bitcoin scandal". Reuters. Retrieved June 8, 2025.
  55. ^ Zachová, Aneta (June 4, 2025). "Czech bitcoin scandal sparks fears of state role in money laundering". Euractiv.com. Retrieved June 8, 2025.
  56. ^ Filippov, Anton (June 6, 2025). "Could the bitcoin scandal bring down Czechia's pro-Ukraine government?". European Pravda. Retrieved June 8, 2025.
  57. ^ Sybera, Albin (June 6, 2025). "Czech finance minister rejects calls for his resignation amid bitcoin scandal embarrassment". bne IntelliNews. Retrieved June 8, 2025.
  58. ^ Senková, Zita; Odložilová, Pavlína (June 5, 2025). "Ekonom Richard Hindls: Zatloukat a vymlčet? Bankám by se aféra s bitcoiny nikdy nestala" (in Czech). Czech Radio. Retrieved June 11, 2025.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.